3 August 2026

Digital tools alone cannot secure food supplies

Digital technologies could strengthen food security in developing countries, but their impact will be limited unless governments address distrust, weak collaboration and institutional inefficiencies, according to a study of Mauritius in the International Journal of Agriculture Innovation, Technology and Globalisation.

The researchers examined the stability pillar of food security, which refers to the ability of a food system to provide reliable access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food over time. This applies even during disruptions such as pandemics, wars, and supply chain failures.

The team interviewed stakeholders across Mauritius’s food sector and found that information is rarely shared because of low levels of trust between producers, businesses, and public authorities. Although digital infrastructure is available, they found that bureaucratic barriers prevent technologies from being used effectively.

Global food security has deteriorated for several years, with recent shocks exposing vulnerabilities in international food supply chains, particularly in import-dependent developing countries. Given that Mauritius imports almost three-quarters of its food, it is particularly vulnerable.

The study argues that digital technologies, such as crop sensors, AI tools, and even blockchain technologies usually associated with cryptocurrencies, might be used to improve food production and safety, but the benefits of using such tools depend on whether or not institutions are willing to exchange information and coordinate their use.

Haug, M., Hund, A. and Gewald, H. (2026) ‘Global hunger is on the rise’: investigating the pillar of stability in developing countries’ agribusinesses’, Int. J. Agriculture Innovation, Technology and Globalisation, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.227–244.

News media may use this press release as source material, in whole or in part, provided the content is not materially misrepresented. A link back to the original article is appreciated.

No comments: